4.6 Review

Functional neuroimaging studies in posttraumatic stress disorder: Review of current methods and findings

Journal

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 202-218

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/da.20208

Keywords

PTSD; PET; fMRI; imaging; hippocampus; amygdala; SPECT; prefrontal cortex

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [S10RR016917] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL088726] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH056120, T32MH067547, K24MH076955, R21MH080208] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCRR NIH HHS [S10 RR016917, S10 RR016917-01] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL088726-04, R01 HL088726] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [T32 MH067547, R01 MH056120, R01 MH056120-12, T32 MH067547-05, K24 MH076955-05, K24 MH076955, R21 MH080208-02, R21 MH080208] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an anxiety disorder associated with changes in neural circuitry involving frontal and limbic systems. Altered metabolism in these brain structures after a traumatic event is correlated to PTSD. Developments in the field of neuroimaging have allowed researchers to look at the structural and functional properties of the brain in PTSD. Despite the relative novelty of functional imaging and its application to the field of PTSD, numerous publications have brought to light several of the circuits implied in this disorder. This article summarizes the findings with regard to PTSD in the functional imaging techniques of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Furthermore, we discuss strengths and weaknesses of the various techniques and studies. Finally, we explore the future potential of functional neuroimaging studies in PTSD. Published 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available