4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The psychogenetically selected Roman high- and low-avoidance rat lines: A model to study the individual vulnerability to drug addiction

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 148-163

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.07.008

Keywords

morphine; cocaine; amphetamine; genetic animal models of drug addiction; dopamine; nucleus accumbens core and shell; opiate and psychostimulant sensitization; brain dialysis; Roman high- and low-avoidance rats

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Roman high- (RHA) and low-avoidance (RLA) rat lines were selected for, respectively, rapid vs poor acquisition of two-way active avoidance in the shuttle-box. Here, we review experimental evidence indicating that, compared with their RLA counterparts, RHA rats display a robust sensation/novelty seeking profile, a marked preference and intake of natural or drug rewards, and more pronounced behavioral and neurochemical responses to the acute administration of morphine and psycho stimulants. Moreover, we show that (i) the repeated administration of morphine and cocaine elicits behavioral sensitization in RHA, but not RLA, rats, (ii) in sensitized RHA rats, acute morphine and cocaine cause a larger increment in dopamine output in the core, and an attenuated dopaminergic response in the shell of the nucleus accumbens, as compared with RHA rats repeatedly treated with saline, and (iii) such neurochemical changes are not observed in the mesoaccumbens dopaminergic system of the sensitization-resistant RLA line. Behavioral sensitization plays a key role in several cardinal features of addiction, including drug craving, compulsive drug seeking and propensity to relapse following detoxification. Comparative studies in the Roman lines may therefore represent a valid approach to evaluate the contribution of the genotype on the neural substrates of drug sensitization and addiction. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available