4.7 Review

Neotic preferences in laboratory rodents: Issues, assessment and substrates

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 441-464

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.11.004

Keywords

neotic preference; novelty; location preferences; stimulus complexity; exploratory rewards; memory; hippocampus; ACh; fear; amygdala; GABA; 5-HT; brain reward; mesolimbic DA system; rats; mice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neotic preference refers to the extent to which animals prefer stimuli of differing novelty value. Degree of novelty is determined by within- and between-trials habituation and amount of temporal (novelty) and spatial change (complexity) in stimulation which in turn will determine the amount of curiosity-based approach (neophilia) or fear-based avoidance (neophobia) of novel stimuli. Tests of genuine neotic preferences enable direct assessments of responsiveness to temporal and spatial changes and include measurements of novel versus familiar locations (such as novelty-related location preferences), responsiveness to stimulus complexity (such as object exploration) and learning for exploratory rewards (such as light-contingent bar-pressing). Effects of brain lesions and peripherally administered drugs have implicated several brain areas and neurotransmitters that subserve memory, fear and reward in neotic preferences namely the hippocampus and ACh (memory), the amygdala, GABA and 5-HT (fear), and the mesolimbic DA reward system. However, more attention should be paid to the complexity of interactions between different brain and neurotransmitter systems and improvements in methodology before conclusions should be drawn about the neurobiological basis of neotic preferences. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available