4.7 Article

Trivalent Ti self-doped Li4Ti5O12: A high performance anode material for lithium-ion capacitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 757, Issue -, Pages 1-7

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.09.002

Keywords

Anode materials; Ti3+ self-doped Li4Ti5O12; Lithium-ion capacitor

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB239701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [21173120, 51372116]
  3. Natural Science Foundations of Jiangsu Province [BK2011030]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of NUAA [NP2014403]
  5. Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation in NUAA [BCXJ14-10]
  6. Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education [KYLX_0255]
  7. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To enhance kinetics of lithium insertion/extraction of anode materials for hybrid lithium-ion capacitors (hybrid LICs), we develop a new applicable strategy toward the synthesis of trivalent Ti self-doped Li4Ti5O12 nanopartides. Starting with Ti2O3, we show that subsequent solid state reaction with Li2CO3 leads to the formation of trivalent Ti self-doped Li4Ti5O12. The presence of trivalent Ti gives rise to high electric conductivity and the nanostructure reduces the transport path lengths of lithium-ions and electrons, permitting fast kinetics for both transported lithium-ions and electrons, thus enabling high-power performance. A high performance hybrid LIC is fabricated by using Ti3+ self-doped Li4Ti5O12 as an insertion-type anode and activated carbon derived from outer peanut shell as cathode, which delivers high energy density (67 Wh kg(-1)), high power density (8000 W kg(-1)). Additionally, the device still retains about 79% of its original capacity even after 5000 cycles at 0.5 A g(-1). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available