4.1 Article

Tumor-associated macrophages and CD3-zeta expression of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in human esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma

Journal

DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 107-116

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00655.x

Keywords

carcinoma; CD3-zeta; esophagus; macrophages; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clinical significance of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and CD3-zeta chain expression of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and their correlation in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are not very clear. Serial histological slides from 137 esophageal SCC patients who had undergone tumor resection were immunohistochemically studied with anti-CD68, anti-CD3-zeta and anti-CD3-epsilon antibodies. TAMs infiltration (expressed as macrophage index, M phi I) and CD3-zeta expression (judged by Z/E = CD3-zeta(+) cells/CD3-epsilon(+) cells ratio) in different tissue compartments were observed. We found that the total tumor tissue region had significantly higher macrophage density and lower CD3-zeta expression (mean +/- SD: M phi Inormal: 225.3 +/- 85.9; Z/E-total: 0.52 +/- 0.25; n = 137) relative to adjacent histologically normal esophageal squamous epithelium (M phi Inormal: 60.5 +/- 31.7, P < 0.001; Z/E-normal: 0.79 +/- 0.35, P = 0.001; n = 70). Significantly higher M phi Istroma (P = 0.006) and lower Z/E-total (P = 0.016) were detected in patients with lymph node metastasis than in those without. Patients with high M phi Itotal and M phi Icancer but low Z/E-total had poorer surgical outcomes. Univariate analysis of M phi Itotal and multivariate analysis of M phi Itotal with specific clinico-pathological parameters demonstrated M phi Itotal to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in esophageal SCC patients (Cox proportional hazard model, P = 0.029 and P = 0.031, respectively).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available