4.7 Article

T cells from indolent CLL patients prevent apoptosis of leukemic B cells in vitro and have altered gene expression profile

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 51-63

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-012-1300-y

Keywords

T cell; Gene array; CLL; Apoptosis

Funding

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. Cancer Society in Stockholm
  3. King Gustav V Jubilee Fund
  4. Stockholm County Council
  5. Cancer and Allergy Foundation
  6. Torsten Foundation
  7. Ragnar Soderberg Foundation
  8. Karolinska Institutet Foundations
  9. Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

T cells may have a role in sustaining the leukemic clone in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this study, we have examined the ability of T cells from CLL patients to support the survival of the leukemic B cells in vitro. Additionally, we compared global gene expression of T cells from indolent CLL patients with healthy individuals and multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Apoptosis of purified leukemic B cells was inhibited in vitro when co-cultured with increasing numbers of autologous T cells (p < 0.01) but not autologous B and T cells of normal donors. The anti-apoptotic effect exceeded that of the anti-apoptotic cytokine IL-4 (p = 0.002) and was greater with CD8+ cells (p = 0.02) than with CD4+ cells (p = 0.05). The effect was depended mainly on cell-cell contact although a significant effect was also observed in transwell experiments (p = 0.05). About 356 genes involved in different cellular pathways were deregulated in T cells of CLL patients compared to healthy individuals and MM patients. The results of gene expression profiling were verified for 6 genes (CCL4, CCL5 (RANTES), XCL1, XCL2, KLF6, and TRAF1) using qRT-PCR and immunoblotting. Our results demonstrate that CLL-derived T cells can prevent apoptosis of leukemic B cells and have altered expression of genes that may facilitate the survival of the leukemic clone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available