3.8 Article

Markers of arterial stiffness are risk factors for progression to end-stage renal disease among patients with chronic kidney disease stages 4 and 5

Journal

NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages C177-C181

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000110678

Keywords

calcification, arterial; stiffness, arterial; augmentation index; chronic kidney disease; pulse wave velocity; applanation tonometry; proteinuria; smoking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Factors associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) contribute to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death. The impact of vascular disease on CKD progression is, however, less well studied. Methods: We examined the effect of markers of vascular disease on the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in 35 patients with CKD stages 4-5. Superficial femoral artery calcification was assessed by CT scan. Augmentation index (AI) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured by applanation tonometry. Results: After 12.4 (5.5-28.4) months, 22/35 patients (63%) had commenced dialysis. Cox regression analysis identified baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio, HR, 0.54; 95% CI 0.41-0.70; p < 0.0001), urinary protein (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.32-2.58; p = 0.0005), PWV (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.07-1.60; p = 0.01), AI (HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.14; p = 0.0001) and pack years of smoking (HR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.03; p = 0.02) as independent risk factors for time to ESRD (-2 log likelihood = 86.7; chi(2) = 30.9; p < 0.0001). Repeat analysis using AI as a categorical variable revealed an HR of 17.5 (95% CI 4.43-68.9; p < 0.0001) for time to ESRD in those with AI above versus below the median. Conclusions: We have identified two markers of arterial stiffness as independent risk factors for progression to ESRD suggesting that vascular disease may contribute to CKD progression. Copyright (C) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available