4.7 Article

Enhancement of tumor immunotherapy by deletion of the A2A adenosine receptor

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 917-926

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-011-1155-7

Keywords

A2a Adenosine receptor; Tumor; T cell; Co-inhibition; B7-DC; Vaccine

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA114227]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The A(2A) adenosine receptor plays a critical and non-redundant role in suppressing inflammation at sites of hypoxia and tissue damage. The tumor microenvironment has high levels of adenosine as a result of hypoxia and ectopic expression of enzymes responsible for the generation of extracellular adenosine. Thus, we sought to determine the ability of A(2A) receptor null mice to immunologically reject tumors. We observed that mice lacking the A(2A) adenosine receptor showed significantly delayed growth of lymphoma cells when compared to WT mice. Furthermore, when immunized with a low dose of tumor or with an irradiated GM-CSF-secreting tumor vaccine, A(2A) receptor null mice showed significantly enhanced protection from a subsequent high-dose challenge from both immunogenic and poorly immunogenic tumor lines. This increase in protection was accompanied by an increase in the number of tumor-antigen-specific CD8 T cells at the vaccine-site draining lymph node. Finally, we found that A(2A) receptor null mice displayed more robust anti-tumor responses than WT mice when they were treated with a soluble B7-DC/Fc fusion protein designed to antagonize B7-H1-mediated co-inhibition. This combinatorial immunotherapy strategy could also be recapitulated with pharmacological A(2A) receptor blockade paired with B7-DC/Fc administration. In light of these data, we believe that blockade of the A(2A) adenosine receptor is an attractive target for tumor immunotherapy that synergizes with other immunomodulatory approaches currently in clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available