4.7 Article

Hypericin-based photodynamic therapy induces surface exposure of damage-associated molecular patterns like HSP70 and calreticulin

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 215-221

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-011-1184-2

Keywords

Calreticulin; HSP70; Photodynamic therapy; Hypericin; Cancer; DAMPs

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) [G.0728.10]
  2. K.U.Leuven [GOA/11/009]
  3. FWO-Vlaanderen [G.0661.09, G.0875.11, G.0973.11]
  4. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme [IAP6/18]
  5. VIB
  6. Ghent University
  7. Federal Research Program [IAP 6/18]
  8. European Research Program [MRTN-CT-035624, Apo-Sys 200767]
  9. Euregional PACTII
  10. Flemish Government [BOF09/01M00709]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface-exposed HSP70 and calreticulin are damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) crucially involved in modulating the success of cancer therapy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the administration of a photosensitising (PTS) agent followed by visible light-irradiation. The reactive oxygen species that are thus generated directly kill tumours by damaging their microvasculature and inducing a local inflammatory reaction. PDT with the PTS photofrin is associated with DAMPs exposure, but the same is not true for other PTSs. Here, we show that when cancer cells are treated with hypericin-based PDT (Hyp-PDT), they surface-expose both HSP70 and calreticulin (CRT). Induction of CRT exposure was not accompanied by co-exposure of ERp57, but this did not compromise the ability of the exposed CRT to regulate the phagocytosis of Hyp-PDT-treated cancer cells by dendritic cells. Interestingly, we found that Hyp-PDT-induced CRT exposure (in contrast to anthracycline-induced CRT exposure) was independent of the presence of ERp57. Our results indicate that Hyp-PDT is a potential anti-cancer immunogenic modality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available