4.7 Article

Activation of extracellular signaling regulated kinase in natural killer cells and monocytes following IL-2 stimulation in vitro and in patients undergoing IL-2 immunotherapy: analysis via dual parameter flow-cytometric assay

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 57, Issue 8, Pages 1137-1149

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-007-0444-7

Keywords

flow-cytometry; interleukin-2; ERK; natural killer cell; T Cells; monocyte

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA16058, 5T32 CA09338-27, P01 CA95426, K24 CA93670] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) activates extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) within immune cells. To examine the profile of phosphorylated ERK (p-ERK) in IL-2 stimulated immune cells of normal donors and patients receiving IL-2 therapy, we developed a dual parameter flow-cytometric assay. An analysis of PBMCs stimulated with IL-2 indicated that IL-2 exposure induced p-ERK in CD56(bright) NK cells and CD14(+) monocytes, but not in CD3(+) T cells or CD21(+) B cells. CD3(+) T cells that were induced to express functional high-affinity IL-2R did not exhibit enhanced p-ERK following IL-2 treatment. Measurement of p-ERK within PBMCs from cancer patients 1 h following their first dose of IL-2 revealed a complete absence of circulating NK cells, consistent with earlier observations. However, the total number of circulating CD14(+) monocytes increased in these samples and 97% of these cells exhibited ERK activation. p-ERK was not observed in T cells post-IL-2 therapy. Analysis of PBMCs obtained 3 weeks post-IL-2 therapy revealed high-p-ERK levels in CD56(bright) NK cells in a subset of patients, while levels of p-ERK returned to baseline in monocytes. These studies reveal an effective method to detect ERK activation in immune cells and demonstrate that IL-2 activates ERK in a subset of NK cells and monocytes but not T cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available