4.7 Article

In vivo effects of zoledronic acid on peripheral gamma delta T lymphocytes in early breast cancer patients

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 31-38

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-008-0521-6

Keywords

gamma delta T cells; Zoledronic acid; Bisphosphonates; Cancer patients

Funding

  1. MIUR (COFIN, 2005)
  2. Giuliana Cardarelli Mazzi cancer research foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduciton Amino-bisphosphonates are potent activators of human gamma delta T cells. The aim of our study was to evaluate the immunomodulating properties of a single-dose of zoledronic acid (ZA) on gamma delta T cells in a select group of disease-free breast cancer patients with osteopenia. Materials and methods Blood samples were obtained, from 23 patients, before and 7, 28, 56, 90 and 180 days after a single-dose (4 mg) of ZA and analyzed by flow cyometry. Results A significant decrease of the different gamma delta T cell subsets was observed: Naive (CD3+/Vdelta2+/CD45RA+/CD27+) after 180 days (P < 0.01); Central Memory (CD3+/Vdelta2+/CD45RA-CD27+) after 28 (P < 0.05), 90 (P < 0.01) and 180 days (P < 0.01); and Effector Memory (CD3+/Vdelta2+/CD45RA-/CD27-) after 56 (P < 0.01) and 90 (P < 0.05) days. Based on the observed gamma delta T cells kinetics patients could be divided in two groups: responders that showed a significant decrease in total numbers of gamma delta T cells and non-responders that showed no significant change. However, in vitro phosphoantigen stimulation of patients cells did not show significant differences in terms of IFN-gamma response by V delta 2 T cells. Conclusion We describe for the first time a long-lasting activation of effector subsets of gamma delta T cells in disease-free breast cancer patients after a single-dose of ZA. Our results highlight the need to further investigate the clinical significance of the immunomodulating properties of N-BPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available