4.4 Review

Review of Aquatic In Situ Approaches for Stressor and Effect Diagnosis

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1897/IEAM_2006-027.1

Keywords

In situ; Decision tree; Environmental monitoring; Caging; Mesocosm

Funding

  1. Environment Canada
  2. European Copper Institute
  3. International Copper Association
  4. International Lead Zinc Research Organization
  5. Nickel Producers Environmental Research Association
  6. Rio Tinto PLV
  7. Rohm and Haas Company
  8. Teck Cominco America
  9. UK Environment Agency
  10. US Army Corps of Engineers
  11. US Environmental Protection Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Field-based (in situ) approaches are used increasingly for measuring biological effects and for stressor diagnoses in aquatic systems because these assessment tools provide realistic exposure environments that are rarely replicated in laboratory toxicity tests. Providing realistic exposure scenarios is important because environmental conditions can alter toxicity through complex exposure dynamics (e.g., multiple stressor interactions). In this critical review, we explore the information provided by aquatic in situ exposure and monitoring methods when compared with more traditional approaches and discuss the associated strengths and limitations of these techniques. In situ approaches can, under some circumstances, provide more valuable information to a decision maker than information from surveys of resident biota, laboratory toxicity tests, or chemical analyses alone. A decision tree is provided to assist decision makers in determining when in situ approaches can add value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available