4.5 Article

Exploration, normalization, and genotype calls of high-density oligonucleotide SNP array data

Journal

BIOSTATISTICS
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 485-499

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl042

Keywords

Affymetrix; genotyping; high-throughput; microarrays

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [2 P50 MH060398-06] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [P50MH060398] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In most microarray technologies, a number of critical steps are required to convert raw intensity measurements into the data relied upon by data analysts, biologists, and clinicians. These data manipulations, referred to as preprocessing, can influence the quality of the ultimate measurements. In the last few years, the high-throughput measurement of gene expression is the most popular application of microarray technology. For this application, various groups have demonstrated that the use of modern statistical methodology can substantially improve accuracy and precision of the gene expression measurements, relative to ad hoc procedures introduced by designers and manufacturers of the technology. Currently, other applications of microarrays are becoming more and more popular. In this paper, we describe a preprocessing methodology for a technology designed for the identification of DNA sequence variants in specific genes or regions of the human genome that are associated with phenotypes of interest such as disease. In particular, we describe a methodology useful for preprocessing Affymetrix single-nucleotide polymorphism chips and obtaining genotype calls with the preprocessed data. We demonstrate how our procedure improves existing approaches using data from 3 relatively large studies including the one in which large numbers of independent calls are available. The proposed methods are implemented in the package oligo available from Bioconductor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available