4.5 Review

Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding Saccades

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 376-397

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.376

Keywords

stop-signal task; cognitive control; frontal eye field; cognitive modeling; stochastic decision models

Funding

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P30HD015052] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [P30EY008126, F32EY016679, R01EY013358] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH055806] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NEI NIH HHS [P30-EY08126, R01-EY13358, F32-EY016679] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NICHD NIH HHS [P30-HD015052] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [R01-MH55806] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stop-signal task has been used to study normal cognitive control and clinical dysfunction. Its utility is derived from a race model that accounts for performance and provides an estimate of the time it takes to stop a movement. This model posits a race between go and stop processes with stochastically independent finish times. However, neurophysiological studies demonstrate that the neural correlates of the go and stop processes produce movements through a network of interacting neurons. The juxtaposition of the computational model with the neural data exposes a paradox-how can a network of interacting units produce behavior that appears to be the outcome of an independent race? The authors report how a simple, competitive network can solve this paradox and provide an account of what is measured by stop-signal reaction time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available