4.2 Review

Cardioprotective prostacyclin signaling in vascular smooth muscle

Journal

PROSTAGLANDINS & OTHER LIPID MEDIATORS
Volume 82, Issue 1-4, Pages 109-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2006.05.011

Keywords

prostacyclin; iloprost; prostacyclin receptor; vascular smooth muscle cells; differentiation; proliferation; COX-2; cardiovascular disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prostacyclin plays an important cardioprotective role, which has been increasingly appreciated in recent years in light of. adverse effects of COX-2 inhibitors in clinical trials. This cardioprotection is thought to be mediated, in part, by prostacyclin inhibition of platelet aggregation. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that prostacyclin additionally protects from cardiovascular disease by pleiotropic effects on vascular smooth muscle. Genetic deletion of the prostacyclin receptor in trice revealed an important role for prostacyclin in preventing the development of atherosclerosis, intimal hyperplasia, and restenosis. In vitro studies have shown these effects may be due to prostacyclin inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. Prostacyclin has also been shown to promote vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation at the level of gene expression through the Gs/cAMP/PKA pathway. Recently identified single nucleotide polymorphisms in the prostacyclin receptor that compromise receptor function suggest that some genetic variations may predispose individuals to increased cardiovascular disease. Herein, we review the literature on the cardioprotective effects of prostacyclin on vascular smooth muscle, and the underlying molecular signaling mechanisms. Understanding the role of prostacyclin and other eicosanoid mediators in the vasculature may lead to improved therapeutic and preventative options for cardiovascular disease. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available