4.6 Article

Therapeutic effect of suicide gene-transferred mesenchymal stem cells in a rat model of glioma

Journal

CANCER GENE THERAPY
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 572-578

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2012.35

Keywords

glioma; mesenchymal stem cell; suicide gene; bystander effect

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [19591675, 19591676, 20890133, 21791364]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20890133, 19591675, 23592125, 23592090, 22591611, 21791364, 19591676] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated a new therapeutic strategy for malignant glioma, which combines intratumoral inoculation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) expressing cytosine deaminase gene with 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) administration. For in vitro and in vivo experiments, MSCs were transfected with adenovirus carrying either enhanced green fluorescent protein gene (AdexCAEGFP) or cytosine deaminase gene (AdexCACD), to establish MSC-expressing EGFP (MSC-EGFP) or CD (MSC-CD). Co-culture of 9L glioma cells with MSC-CD in a medium containing 5-FC resulted in a remarkable reduction in 9L cell viability. The migratory ability of MSC-EGFP toward 9L cells was demonstrated by double-chamber assay. For the in vivo study, rats harboring 9L brain tumors were inoculated with MSC-EGFP or MSC-CD. Immunohistochemistry of rat brain tumors inoculated with MSC-EGFP showed intratumoral distribution of MSC-EGFP. Survival analysis of rats bearing 9L gliomas treated with intratumoral MSC-CD and intraperitoneal 5-FC resulted in significant prolongation of survival compared with control animals. In conclusion, molecular therapy combining suicide gene therapy and MSCs as a targeting vehicle represents a potential new therapeutic approach for malignant glioma, both with respect to the antitumor potential of this system and its neuroprotective effect on normal brain tissue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available