4.3 Article

Spectroscopic and microscopic characterization of uranium biomineralization in Myxococcus xanthus

Journal

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 441-449

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490450701437651

Keywords

U(VI); Myxococcus xanthus; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; TEM/EDX; m-autunite; phosphatase activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies were carried out to elucidate at molecular scale the interaction mechanisms of Myxococcus xanthus with uranium at different pH values. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopic measurements showed that there are significant differences in the structural parameters of the U complexes formed by this bacterium at pH 2 and 4.5. At very low acidic pH of 2, the cells accumulated U( VI) as organic phosphate-metal complexes. At pH 4.5, however, the cells of this bacterium precipitated U( VI) as meta-autunitelike phase. TEM analyses demonstrated that at pH 2 the uranium accumulates were located mainly at the cell surface, whereas at pH 4.5 a uranium precipitation occurred on the cell wall and within the extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) characteristic of this bacterium. Dead/live staining studies showed that 30% and 50% of the uranium treated cell populations were alive at pH 2 and 4.5, respectively. The precipitation of U(VI) as mineral meta-autunitelike phase is possibly due to the bacterial acidic phosphatase activity. The precipitation of uranium as mineral phases may lead to more stable U(VI) sequestration that may be suitable for remediation purposes. These observations, combined with the very high uranium accumulation capability of the studied bacterial cells indicate that M. xanthus may significantly influence the fate of uranium in soil environments where these bacterial species are mainly found.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available