3.8 Article

Expression of two testis-specific genes, TSGA10 and SYCP3, in different cancers regarding to their pathological features

Journal

CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 296-302

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.05.002

Keywords

cancer-testis genes; TSGA10; tumor antigens; gene expression; SYCP3; histopathology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cancer-testis genes are a group of genes expressed in testicular germinal cells and a range of human cancers. Testis-specific gene A10 (TSGA10) is expressed in testis and actively dividing and fetal differentiating tissues. Mouse homologue (Tsga10) mRNA is translated to a 65 kDa protein and appears to be processed to a major fibrous sheath protein of sperm tail. SYCP3 gene is supposed to be a testis-specific gene and constitutes the core of the lateral elements of synaptonemal complex. It has role in regulating DNA binding to the chromatid axis, sister chromatid cohesion, synapsis, and recombination. Methods: In this study expression of TSGA10 and SYCP3 were investigated in different cancers (156 tumor samples) using RT-PCR. Diagnosis of cancer was based on histopathological reports. The association with histopathological characteristics of tumors was analyzed using statistical programs. Results: TSGAIO expression was observed in 83% of brain tumors, 66% of breast cancers, 58% of gastrointestinal tumors, 66% of skin tumors and 53% of soft tissue tumors. But, SYCP3 transcripts were found in four tumor samples (moderately differentiated gemistocytic astrocytoma, pituitary adenoma, glioma and an ovarian tumor). Conclusion: These results may get further insight into TSGA10, but not SYCP3, potential role as a cancer marker and a cancer testis gene implicated in tumorogenesis of cancers. (c) 2007 International Society for Preventive Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available