4.4 Review

A feminist exploration of Traveller women's experiences of maternity care in the Republic of Ireland

Journal

MIDWIFERY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 248-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.03.011

Keywords

traveller women; feminist research; maternity care; Republic of Ireland

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: to explore Traveller women's experiences of maternity care so that their needs might be identified and perceptions of helpful responses elicited. Design: feminist research methodology using unstructured non-directive interviews. Setting: community setting in the Republic of Ireland. Participants: snowball sample of 13 Traveller women aged 19-42 years. Each had experienced between two and eight pregnancies. Findings: a fluid concept of culture affected Traveller women's expectations and negotiation of maternity care. The essential nature of familism, socialisation and religious beliefs, and the particular emphasis placed upon peer support, reflected cohesive and supportive aspects of culture. The concept of 'possessive individualism' was portrayed as conflicting with contraceptive use, the uptake of preventive care and women's reporting of mental-health problems. Majority norm expectations of breast feeding, husband participation and 'rooming in' were culturally unacceptable. Political and structural factors, such as the direct discriminatory barriers created by general practitioner services, indirect discrimination arising from dysfunctional communication and control of information, poor housing and lack of public transport were the basic causes of inequity of access to care. Implications for practice: midwives are challenged to respond sensitively to cultural preferences, meet informational needs and act as political advocates in efforts to improve maternity care experiences for Traveller women. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available