3.8 Article

Continuous quality improvement: integrating best practice into teacher education

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/09513540710738674

Keywords

Best practice; Professional education; Universities

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - This paper aims to provide a framework for continuous, quality, low cost professional development opportunities at the university level to improve the quality of the instructional practices and/or curriculum used in the teacher education program. Design/methodology/approach - Background of the design, needs assessment and implementation of professional development ( best practice seminars) based upon the established best practices principles is described. Findings - Provides information about the various seminars that were held each year based upon the faculty needs assessment which is administered biennially. This needs assessment is developed based upon input from the yearly Beginning Teacher Assistance Program survey, P-12 Regional Professional Development Center Advisory Group, current research and yearly goals set by university departments. Practical implications - A useful framework for other colleges and universities to provide continuous, quality, low cost professional development opportunities. At the very least, these seminars will raise awareness of current instructional practices and curriculum that is currently being used in P-12 schools to raise student achievement. Hopefully, these best practice seminars will change instructional practice and curriculum at the university level to improve teacher education programs. Originality/value - This paper fulfills an identified need in the field of continuous quality improvement in the field of teacher education and offers a very useful framework for establishing a design to complete professional development at the university level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available