4.3 Article

Resources and sex: Soil re-colonization by sexual and parthenogenetic oribatid mites

Journal

PEDOBIOLOGIA
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2006.11.001

Keywords

oribatid mites; resource depletion; re-colonization; parthenogenesis; sex ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Factors responsible for the dominance of sexual reproduction in Metazoa are controversial. Generally, the mode of reproduction is correlated with ecological factors: under resource-limited conditions sexual taxa dominate, whereas theoretically parthenogenetic species prevail. in stable habitats. To investigate if sexual or parthenogenetic taxa are more affected by environmental conditions, we analyzed (1) the effect of resource depletion on the density of sexual and parthenogenetic oribatid mite taxa and (2) the re-colonization of defaunated soil and litter by sexual. and parthenogenetic taxa. In both experiments, the number of eggs in parthenogenetic and sexual species was counted. For the first experiment, laboratory microcosms were established where resources declined with time; for the second experiment, microcosms were defaunated by heat and inoculated with fresh soil and litter material, respectively, as resource for re-colonization by oribatid mites. We hypothesized that parthenogenetic species wilt suffer more from resource limitation compared to sexual taxa, and that they will colonize habitable space faster due to their faster mode of reproduction. In agreement with our hypothesis, parthenogenetic taxa suffered more from resource [imitation than sexual species. In contrast, in the re-colonization experiment the proportion of parthenogenetic taxa remained constant in the treatment re-colonized from soil as well as from litter, indicating that parthenogenetic species are not faster colonizers. In general, egg numbers were higher in sexual species than in parthenogenetic species. (c) 2006 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available