4.5 Article

Synergistic Effects of NAT2 slow and GSTM1 null Genotypes on Carcinogen DNA Damage in the Lung

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1492-1497

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1195

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [CA074386, CA092824, CA090578]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Polymorphisms in carcinogen detoxification enzymes, NAT2 and GSTM1, have been suggested as susceptibility factors for DNA damage and lung cancer. However, little information is available on DNA adduct burden in the lung tissue and polymorphisms in NAT2 and GST genes. We investigated the independent and combined effects of the metabolic gene polymorphisms of NAT2 and GSTs on DNA adduct formation in different tissues (lung and blood) in lung cancer patients. Methods: DNA adducts were measured in lung and blood by the P-32-postlabeling assay. Multiple regression models were used to assess adjusted percent change in DNA adduct levels associated with GST and NAT2 genotypes. Results: After adjusting for potential confounders, as well as for other GST gene variants, lung adduct levels significantly increased by 150.3% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 35.4-362.6%] for the GSTM1 null and by 73.9% (95% CI, -3.2% to 212.4%) for theNAT2 slow acetylator genotype, respectively. No association was seen with polymorphisms of other GST genes such as GSTT1 and GSTP1. The high-risk group, the combined GSTM1 null plus NAT2 slow, had significantly enhanced levels of lung adducts by 295% (95% CI, 72.7-803.5%) over those associated with single genes, suggesting a synergistic effect on DNA damage in the target lung tissue. Conclusions: The increase in DNA adduct levels in lung is associated with the GSTM1 null and NAT2 slow genotypes alone or in combination. Impact: These results suggest that GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes play an independent and interactive role in the formation of carcinogen DNA adduct in the lung. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(6); 1492- 7. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available