4.5 Article

Glutathione Pathway Genetic Polymorphisms and Lung Cancer Survival After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 811-821

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0871

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 GM28157, R01 CA80127, R01 CA84354, R01 CA115857, R01 CA132780, R03 CA77118, U01 GM61388]
  2. PhRMA Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Lung cancer is commonly treated with platinum compounds. The glutathione pathway participates in the metabolism of platinum compounds. We set out to test the hypotheses that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or copy number polymorphisms for genes within the glutathione pathway might influence survival in lung cancer patients treated with these drugs. Methods: Germline DNA samples from 973 lung cancer patients were genotyped for 290 glutathione pathway SNPs. GSTT1 copy number was also assayed. We determined the association of these polymorphisms with survival for lung cancer patients, followed by functional genomic validation. Results: We observed suggestive associations between survival and GSTT1 copy number (P = 0.017), and GSTA5, GSTM4, and ABCC4 SNPs, adjusted for covariates (P = 0.018, 0.002, and 0.002, respectively) or not (P = 0.005, 0.011, and 0.002). One hundred lymphoblastoid cell lines were then treated with cisplatin, and IC(50) values were significantly associated with the GSTM4 SNP (P = 0.019). Furthermore, GSTM4, GSTT1, and ABCC4 overexpression significantly decreased cisplatin sensitivity in lung cancer and HEK293T cell lines. Conclusions: These results suggest that GSTM4 polymorphisms are biomarkers for the prediction of cisplatin response. ABCC4 polymorphisms, as well as GSTT1 copy number, may also help to predict cisplatin response, but further validation is required. These results represent a step toward the individualized chemotherapy of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(3); 811-21. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available