4.5 Article

Single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of absorption-enhanced 3,3′-diindolylmethane in healthy subjects

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 2619-2624

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0520

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [N01-CN-35008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have completed a single ascending dose clinical study of the proposed chemopreventive agent 3,3'-diindolylmethane (DIM). The study agent was nutritional-grade, absorption-enhanced BioResponse 3,3'-diindolylmethane (BR-DIM). We determined the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single doses of BR-DIM in drug-free, non-smoking, healthy men and women. Groups of four subjects were enrolled for each dose level. After randomization, one subject in each group received placebo whereas three received active BR-DIM. The doses administered were 50,100,150,200, and 300 mg, with the 300-mg dose repeated in an additional group. No BR-DIM-related adverse effects were reported at doses up to 200 mg. At the 300-mg dose, one of six subjects reported mild nausea and headache and one also reported vomiting. Only the latter effect was judged as probably related to the study agent. Analysis of serial plasma samples showed that only one subject at the 50-mg dose had detectable concentrations of DIM. The single 100-mg dose of BR-DIM resulted in a mean maximum plasma concentration (C-max) Of 32 ng/mL and a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 128 h ng/mL, and a single 200-mg dose produced a mean Cmax of 104 ng/mL and a mean AUC of 553 h ng/mL. The single 300-mg dose of BR-DIM resulted in a mean C-max. of 108 ng/mL and a mean AUC of 532 h ng/mL. We conclude that BR-DIM is well tolerated at single doses of up to 200 mg, and that increasing the dose to 300 mg did not result in an increase in C-max.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available