4.3 Article

Statin use and survival following glioblastoma multiforme

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 722-727

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.09.010

Keywords

Glioma; Glioblastoma multiforme; Statins; Brain tumour epidemiology; Risk; Cohort study

Funding

  1. Danish Cancer Society [R56-A2879]
  2. Odense University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: While some studies indicate a potential chemopreventive effect of statin use on the risk of glioma, the effect of statins on the prognosis of brain tumours has not yet been examined. We thus conducted a cohort study evaluating the influence of statin use on survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Methods: We identified 1562 patients diagnosed with GBM during 2000-2009 from the Danish Cancer Registry and linked this cohort to Danish nationwide demographic and health registries. Within the GBM cohort, each patient recorded as using statins prior to diagnosis (defined as >= 2 redeemed prescriptions) was matched to two statin non-users (<2 redeemed prescriptions) by propensity scores based on age, gender, year of diagnosis, comorbidity, and use of selected drugs. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause death associated with prediagnostic statin use. Results: A total of 339 GBM patients were included in the analyses. Of these, 325 died during median follow-up of 6.9 months (interquartile range: 3.8-13.4 months). Prediagnostic statin use was associated with a reduced HR of death (0.79; 95% CI: 0.63-1.00). The HRs decreased with increasing duration or intensity of prediagnostic statin use [long-term (>= 5 years) statin use: HR 0.75 (95% CI: 0.47-1.20); high-intensity statin use: HR 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44-0.98)]. Additional adjustment for oncotherapeutic modalities yielded similar results (overall HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.63-1.01). Conclusion: Long-term prediagnostic statin use may improve survival following GBM. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available