4.3 Article

Intake of dietary fats and colorectal cancer risk: Prospective findings from the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 562-567

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.07.008

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Prevention of cancer; Epidemiology; Dietary fats; Diet records

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. British Heart Foundation
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Department of Health, UK
  5. Food Standards Agency, UK
  6. Lloyds TSB Foundation for the Channel Islands
  7. Medical Research Council, UK
  8. Stroke Association, UK
  9. World Cancer Research Fund
  10. MRC [MC_U105960384, MC_U105260558, G0500300, MC_U123092725, MC_U105630924, MC_U123092726, G0902037] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. British Heart Foundation [RG/07/008/23674] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_U105960384, G0902037, MC_U105260558, MC_U123092725, G19/35, MC_U105630924, G0100222, G0500300, G0500300B, UD99999933, G8802774, G0401527, MC_U123092726] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Epidemiologic evidence for an association between colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and total dietary fat, saturated fat (SF), monounsaturated fat (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fat (PUFA) is inconsistent. Previous studies have used food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) to assess diet, but data from food diaries may be less prone to severe measurement error than data from FFQ. Methods: We conducted a case-control study nested within seven prospective UK cohort studies, comprising 579 cases of incident CRC and 1996 matched controls. Standardized dietary data from 4- to 7-day food diaries and from FFQ were used to estimate odds ratios for CRC risk associated with intake of fat and subtypes of fat using conditional logistic regression. We also calculated multivariate measurement error corrected odds ratios for CRC using repeated food diary measurements. Results: We observed no associations between intakes of total dietary fat or types of fat and CRC risk, irrespective of whether dietary data were obtained using food diaries or FFQ. Conclusion: Our results do not support the hypothesis that intakes of total dietary fat, SF, MUFA or PUFA are linked to risk of CRC. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available