4.1 Article

The profiles of adults who consult alternative health practitioners and/or general practitioners

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 86-92

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/02813430701267439

Keywords

complementary therapies; family practice; family physicians; health services; Norway; population

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To compare the profiles of people visiting only a general practitioner ( GP), those visiting only a practitioner of complementary and alternative medicine ( CAM), and those visiting both ( GP& CAM). Design. A comparative total population health survey in central Norway ( HUNT 2). Subjects. A total of 54 448 persons 20 years of age and over who answered questions about their use of health services during the previous 12 months. Variables. Sociodemographic characteristics, self-perceived health, subjective health complaints, and a variety of common diseases. Results. Some 34 854 ( 64.0%) of those who answered the health service use question had visited only a GP, 837 ( 1.5%) only a CAM practitioner, and 4563 ( 8.4%) both during the last 12 months. The likelihood of being a CAM-only user as compared to a GP-only user was significantly increased ( p<0.005) if the participant was male; aged between 30 and 69; and without cardiovascular disease. The likelihood of being a GP& CAM user compared with a GP-only user was significantly increased ( p<0.005) for those who were female; aged between 30-59; had a higher education level; were non-smokers; had lower perceived global health; had a limiting chronic complaint; had experienced a health complaint during the last 12 months; had musculoskeletal disease; had a psychiatric complaint; and had hay fever. Conclusion. There were few CAM-only users and they differ from GP-only users by being male, aged 30-69, and without cardiovascular disease. Users of both GP& CAM were less healthy with more complaints and poorer self-reported health than GP- and CAM-only users.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available