4.0 Article

C-reactive protein-induced endothelial microparticle generation in HUVECs is related to BH4-dependent NO formation

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 241-248

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000100558

Keywords

C-reactive protein; endothelial microparticles; endothelium; human umbilical vein endothelial cells; nitric oxide; tetrahydrobiopterin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) has been proven to facilitate endothelial injury via reduced NO production. Endothelial microparticles (EMPs) have emerged as a novel marker of endothelial injury. Methods: In vitro cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were incubated with CRP (20 mg/l) for 24 h. The numbers of EMPs with CD31-and CD51-positive staining were assessed flow-cytometrically, and NO production was measured using the Griess reaction in the presence or absence of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), respectively. Results: The number of EMPs was significantly increased in HUVECs stimulated by CRP compared with the control group and, in parallel, NO production was decreased (p ! 0.05). In the presence of CRP, pretreatment with BH4 decreased EMP counts and restored NO production to baseline levels (p ! 0.05) while pretreatment with 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine (DAHP), a BH4 synthesis inhibitor, further prompted EMP formation and de creased NO production (p < 0.05). However, adding exogenous BH4 after pretreatment with DAHP suppressed EMP formation and restored NO production (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CRP induces EMP generation in HUVECs and this effect is, at least in part, related to impaired BH4-dependent NO production. Augmented EMP generation in HUVECs is suggested as a novel potential mechanism contributing to the pathogenesis of vascular injury related to CRP. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available