Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The unsatisfactory ThinPrep® Pap Test: Analysis of technical aspects, most common causes, and recommendations for improvement
Marilin Rosa et al.
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY (2013)
Unsatisfactory rates vary between cervical cytology samples prepared using ThinPrep and SurePath platforms: a review and meta-analysis
Daniel Fontaine et al.
BMJ OPEN (2012)
Interference Potential of Personal Lubricants and Vaginal Medications on ThinPrep® Pap Tests
Tim D. Feit et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE (2011)
Restoring satisfactory status in ThinPrep Pap test specimens with too few squamous cells and containing microscopic red blood cells
Yijun Pang et al.
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY (2008)
Protocol for the processing of bloody cervical specimens:: Glacial acetic acid and the ThinPrep® Pap Test™
LA Haack et al.
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY (2006)
A simple method to determine the need for glacial acetic acid treatment of bloody ThinPrep Pap tests before slide processing
LR Rowe et al.
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY (2004)
The efficacy of reprocessing unsatisfactory cervicovaginal ThinPrep specimens with and without glacial acetic acid - Effect on hybrid capture II human papillomavirus testing and clinical follow-up
SN Agoff et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (2002)
The 2001 Bethesda System - Terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology
D Solomon et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)
Share Paper
