4.1 Article

Large subunit rDNA and rbcL gene sequence data place Petrohua bernabei gen. et sp nov in the Batrachospermales (Rhodophyta), but do not provide further resolution among taxa in this order

Journal

PHYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 103-112

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1835.2007.00453.x

Keywords

Batrachospermales; Chile; freshwater; large subunit rRNA; molecular systematics; Petrohua; phylogeny; rbcL; Rhodophyta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phylogenetic relationship among 12 previously described batrachospermalean taxa and a novel member of the order were investigated using the LSU and rbcL genes separately and in combination. The primary goal of this research was to establish the phylogenetic placement of a previously undescribed freshwater red alga from Chile. The results showed that the new entity with pseudoparenchymatous tube morphology is a member of the Batrachospermales and Petrohua bernabei gen. et sp. nov. is described herein. This is the first record to our knowledge of a Lemanea-like alga from Chile. It would appear that this thallus construction has evolved at least three times in the Batrachospermales and that the switch from a Batrachospermum-like construction to a pseudoparenchymatous construction may be a repeated adaptive response to turbulent waterfall habitats. In addition to providing information about a new freshwater red alga, this study sought to determine whether combining the data from two genes would produce a more robust phylogeny, particularly for intermediate nodes, to resolve familial relationships within the order. As with previous analyses, the Batrachospermales was resolved as a clade and support was high for relationships resolved among relatively recent nodes. Unfortunately, combining the LSU and rbcL data did not have the desired effect of more fully resolving intermediate nodes among the Batrachospermales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available