4.4 Article

Successful challenges using native E-coli asparaginase after hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated E-coli asparaginase

Journal

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 6, Pages 1307-1313

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2464-2

Keywords

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Pediatric; Asparaginase; Hypersensitivity; Anti-asparaginase antibody; Asparaginase activity

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA 21765, CA 142665, CA 36401]
  2. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
  3. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asparaginase is an essential component of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy. However, asparaginase-induced hypersensitivity reactions can compromise its efficacy either by directly influencing the pharmacokinetics of asparaginase or by leading to a discontinuation of asparaginase treatment. Here, we report successful challenges using native Escherichia coli asparaginase after previous hypersensitivity reactions to both PEGylated E. coli asparaginase and Erwinia asparaginase. The two patients included in this case report were diagnosed with B-precursor ALL at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and were treated with a common regimen. Both patients developed hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated E. coli asparaginase and Erwinia asparaginase early in treatment, and they were challenged with native E. coli asparaginase. Serum samples were collected for estimating the pharmacokinetic parameters of each patient during native E. coli asparaginase therapy. Challenges with native E. coli asparaginase were successful, and asparaginase serum concentrations above therapeutic levels were attained in both patients. These two cases suggest that some patients can be given native E. coli asparaginase after hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated asparaginase and achieve therapeutic concentrations of the drug in serum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available