3.8 Article

Biologics in Rotator Cuff Surgery: Management of Rotator Cuff Tears With an Extracellular Matrix Patch

Journal

TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 43-54

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.bto.0000261758.10190.4e

Keywords

Rotator cuff tearChronic; Failed rotator cuff repair; Massive; Extracellular matrix; Rotator cuff augmentation; Biologic augmentation; Graft substitute; Small intestinal submucosa; Human dermal matrix

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic large and massive rotator cuff tears remain a treatment challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. The use of an extracellular matrix (ECM) biologic patch is an emerging field and offers potential for the treatment of patients with failed rotator cuff repairs or those with tears that are chronic and large in nature. There are several commercially available grafts that are derived from a variety of allogeneic (dermis) and xenogeneic (dermis and small intestinal submucosa) sources. An extensive amount of basic science and preclinical models have demonstrated that an ECM patch may offer improved healing rates with a biomechanical profile that nearly reproduces the characteristics of the native rotator cuff tendon. One should keep in mind the exact application of the ECM patch when interpreting studies, either as an augmentation (onlay) versus interpositional (intercalary) technique, which may significantly alter the overall efficacy of the ECM patch. Although there is an extensive amount of basic science and preclinical work to justify their use in animal models, the application of ECM patches in the human setting has not been as encouraging. The purposes of this paper are to review the basic science and preclinical data on the use of ECM patches, to describe current clinical indications, techniques, and to review the results in both animal and human studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available