4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase II study of cisplatin and oral VP16 in patients with refractory or relapsed Ewing sarcoma

Journal

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages 399-404

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-012-2015-7

Keywords

Ewing sarcoma; Relapse; Paediatric; Phase II trial; Cisplatin; VP-16

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phase II trials demonstrate the activity of cisplatin in patients with refractory Ewing sarcoma family tumours (ESFT) and also the feasibility of giving cisplatin with oral VP16 in a variety of different cancers. This trial was conducted to evaluate the activity and toxicity profile of this combination delivered as outpatient therapy in patients with refractory/relapsed ESFT. Cisplatin was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 and days 29, 36 and 43 (70 mg/m(2)/dose for patients < 21 years of age and 50 mg/m(2)/dose a parts per thousand yen21 years). VP16 was administered at a dose of 50 mg/m(2) on days 1-15 and days 29-43 inclusive. A three-stage Fleming statistical design was used for analysis. Between January 2003 and October 2006, 45 patients aged between 5 and 46 years (median 19) were enrolled. Thirty-eight were evaluable for response. Patients had previously received one to three lines of chemotherapy (median = one). Seventy-three per cent of the patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, 20 % developed fever, 40 % had grade 3/4 anaemia, 68 % grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and 16 % grade 2/3 ototoxicity. Measured response after 2 cycles: 0 CR, 7 PR (18 %), 13 SD (34 %), 18 PD (48 %). There was excellent concordance between unidimensional and bidimensional criteria in 31 of 33 responses (94 %). PFS at 1 year was 39 %, with a median PFS of 6 months. Overall survival at 1 year was 44 %; median survival was 11 months. Cisplatin combined with oral VP16 is well tolerated and has acceptable side effects, but limited clinical activity in refractory/relapsed ESFT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available