4.4 Article

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of UTD1, a genetically engineered epothilone analog in patients with advanced solid tumors

Journal

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 971-978

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1571-6

Keywords

Epothilone; MTD; DLT; Pharmacokinetics; UTD1

Funding

  1. State Innovation Fund for Small and Medium Enterprise of China
  2. National HighTechnology Project [2004AA2Z3T63]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The epothilones are a novel class of microtubule-stabilizing agents. UTD1 is an epothilone analog generated by genetic manipulation of the polyketide bio-synthetic gene cluster. This phase I study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic(PK) profiles of UTD1 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and methods This was an open-label, single-arm, one site, phase I, dose-escalation study. Patients were treated with escalating doses of UTD1 as a 3-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Results Twenty-one patients were enrolled and received UTD1 at six dose levels ranging from 25 to 225 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was ataxia, and other frequent non-haematological toxicities were peripheral neuropathy, gastrointestinal disorders, fatigue, and myalgia/arthralgia. Myelosuppression was rare, with no grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, in contrast to paclitaxel and ixabepilone. The maximum-tolerated dose was established as 170 mg/m(2). Preliminary results showed linear pharmacokinetics along the range of doses tested. Prolonged disease stabilization was observed in patients with breast cancer, non-small lung cancer, and other cancers. Conclusions The recommended phase II dose of UTD1 is 170 mg/m(2) as a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. Ataxia was the DLT. UTD1 showed advantages over paclitaxel and Ixapebilone in relation to safety profile, especially myelosuppression. The acceptable tolerability warrants further phase II study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available