4.4 Article

Phase II study of paclitaxel combined with capecitabine as second-line treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma after failure of cisplatin-based regimens

Journal

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 549-555

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-008-0903-7

Keywords

Advanced gastric cancer; Capecitabine; Paclitaxel; Second-line chemotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine the safety and the efficacy of paclitaxel and capecitabine as second-line combination chemotherapy after failure of platinum regimens in advanced gastric cancer. Patients with histologically proven gastric cancer and measurable metastatic disease received capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily (1,650 mg/m(2) per day) on days 1-14 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Between June 2003 and October 2005, 26 patients, of median age 59 years (range 41-84 years) were included in the study and were treated by paclitaxel/capecitabine combination. Overall response rate was 34.6% (95%CI = 17.2-55.7%) with one complete response and 42.3% (95%CI = 17.2-55.7%) of patients achieved a stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 4.5 months (95%CI = 4-4.5 months). Median overall survival was 7.5 months (95%CI = 6-10 months). Cumulated overall survival including cisplatin regimens was 15.5 months (95%CI = 11-18 months). Grade 3/4 adverse events included alopecia (30.8%), neutropenia (11.5%), hand foot skin reaction (11.5%), neuropathy (11.5%), arthralgias (7.5%), and anemia (3.8%). Paclitaxel and capecitabine combination was safe and effective in advanced gastric cancer after failure of cisplatin regimens. The cumulated overall survival of 15.5 months suggests a particular interest of taxanes in second-line treatment after failure of platinum salts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available