4.7 Article

Expression of MACC1 and c-Met in human gastric cancer and its clinical significance

Journal

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2867-13-121

Keywords

Gastric cancer; Metastasis associated with colon cancer1; c-Met; Peritoneal metastasis; Lymph node metastasis; Hepatic metastasis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30960371]
  2. Gansu Provincial Health industry research programs [GSWST-09-11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent studies have suggested that the metastasis-associated colon cancer1 (MACC1) gene can promote tumor proliferation, invasion and metastasis through an upregulation of c-Met expression. However, its role in gastric cancer is controversial. Our study investigated expression of MACC1 and c-Met in gastric cancer, as well as correlated this with clinicopathological parameters. Methods: Expressions of MACC1 and c-Met protein in a sample of 98 gastric carcinoma and adjacent nontumorous tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry. Their relationships and correlations with clinicopathological features were analyzed. Results: The positive rates of MACC1 and c-Met protein in primary tumors were 61.22% and 59.18%, respectively. A significant correlation was found between expression of MACC1 and c-Met (P<0.05). Expression of the MACC1 protein in gastric cancer tissue was correlated with lymph node metastasis (chi(2) = 10.555, P = 0.001), peritoneal metastasis (chi(2) = 5.694, P = 0.017), and hepatic metastasis (chi(2) = 4.540, P = 0.033), but not with age, gender, tumor size, location, clinical stage or the distant metastases (P>0.05). Conclusion: The positive rate of MACC1 protein expression was related to the protein expression of c-Met. Both had a correlation with the presence of peritoneal metastasis, lymph node metastasis and hepatic metastasis, all of which contribute to a poor prognosis for gastric cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available