4.8 Article

The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

Journal

CANCER CELL
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 319-330

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.07.014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [5U24CA143843, U54HG003273, 5U24CA143866, KL2TR001109, UL1TR001111, 5P50CA101942, U54 HG003067, K24CA172355]
  2. NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research
  3. Frederick National Lab, NIH [HHSN261200800001E]
  4. NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  5. Keck Center for Interdisciplinary Bioscience Training of the Gulf Coast Consortia [T15 LM007093]
  6. J. Randall AMP
  7. Kathleen L. MacDonald Kidney Cancer Research Fund
  8. Tuttle Family Kidney Cancer Research Fund
  9. Ministry of Health AMP
  10. Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI13C2096]
  11. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information [K-14-L01-C02-S04, KSC-2013-C3-037]
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences [0845783] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [0845783] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe the landscape of somatic genomic alterations of 66 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (ChRCCs) on the basis of multidimensional and comprehensive characterization, including mtDNA and whole-genome sequencing. The result is consistent that ChRCC originates from the distal nephron compared with other kidney cancers with more proximal origins. Combined mtDNA and gene expression analysis implicates changes in mitochondrial function as a component of the disease biology, while suggesting alternative roles for mtDNA mutations in cancers relying on oxidative phosphorylation. Genomic rearrangements lead to recurrent structural breakpoints within TERT promoter region, which correlates with highly elevated TERT expression and manifestation of kataegis, representing a mechanism of TERT upregulation in cancer distinct from previously observed amplifications and point mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available