4.2 Article

Oxidative effects of Na+-specific ionophore monensin on the rat epididymis

Journal

DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 411-423

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01480540701524136

Keywords

chemical contraception; monensin; oxidative stress; rat epididymis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The carboxylic antibiotic ionophore monensin is well- known for the Na+/H+ exchanger activity across the biological membranes. The current study has been designed to investigate the effect of monensin on spermatozoal concentration, motility, and oxidative stress - related parameters in the rat epididymis. Monensin was administered orally at a dose of 3.5 mg/kg body weight daily for 70 days, a duration that coincides with the completion of the spermatogenic cycle. At the end of the respective treatment, the epididymis was isolated into three separate regions - the capitum, corpus, and the cauda - successively away from the head of the testis. Marked changes were noted in the body weight, organ (epididymis) weight, sperm concentration and motility, as well as the morphologic observations of the sperm and the histologic architecture of the epididymal epithelium. Significant alterations were also recorded in the oxidative stress parameters such as the lipid peroxidation product, malonyldialdehyde, and the activity of superoxide dismutase, glutathione sulfotransferase, glutathione reductase, and catalase. The nonenzymatic thiol content such as the total, oxidized, and reduced glutathione showed significant changes and the tissue phosphatases such as alkaline and acid phosphatase were increased, indicative of the interference of the drug in lysosomal and Golgi membrane complex. The findings of the current study indicate interactions during the spermatozoal maturational process in the epididymis, and a significant potential use of monensin in male contraception may be suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available