4.3 Article

Sleep apnea and subsequent cancer incidence

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 987-994

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-018-1073-5

Keywords

Sleep apnea; Intermittent hypoxia; Cancer registry; Population health; Medical records

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA015704, T32 CA094880, R03 CA201806] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIH HHS [P30CA015704] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeIn vitro and animal models suggest that the physiological effects of sleep apnea could contribute to cancer risk, yet epidemiologic studies have been inconsistent.MethodsWe identified a cohort of adults diagnosed with sleep apnea between 2005 and 2014 using regional administrative databases. Linking this cohort to a population-based cancer registry, we identified first incident cancers diagnosed after sleep apnea diagnosis through 2015. We calculated age-sex standardized cancer incidence ratios (SIRs) to compare the observed number of cancers among those with sleep apnea with expected population estimates over a comparable period.ResultsAmong 34,402 individuals with sleep apnea, 1,575 first incident cancers were diagnosed during follow-up (meanSD; 5.3 +/- 2.0years). Compared to the general population, cancer incidence (SIR 1.26, 95% CI 1.20-1.32) was elevated among sleep apnea patients. We observed significantly elevated incidence for kidney (SIR 2.24, 95% CI 1.82-2.72), melanoma (SIR 1.71, 95% CI 1.42-2.03), breast (SIR 1.43, 95% CI 1.76-2.00), and corpus uteri (SIR 2.80, 95% CI 2.24-2.47) while risk for lung (SIR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.79) and colorectal cancer (SIR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.89) was lower.Conclusion p id=Par4 These findings suggest an elevated cancer burden, particularly at certain sites, among individuals with diagnosed sleep apnea. Results should be interpreted with caution due to unmeasured confounders (e.g., BMI, diabetes).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available