4.3 Article

Circulating leptin levels and risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma: a case-control study and meta-analysis

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 2129-2141

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-013-0290-1

Keywords

Circulating leptin; Obesity; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal adenoma; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Equivocal results regarding the role of leptin in colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenoma (CRA) have been reported. A case-control study investigating the association of leptin with CRC risk and clinicopathological characteristics along with meta-analysis of published data on both CRC and CRA were conducted. Pubmed and Embase were searched for the meta-analysis, comprising 28 case-control studies amounting 3,614 CRC and 1,215 CRA cases, along with 5,220 controls. Meticulous contact with the authors of individual studies was undertaken for the provision of additional data. Pooling of standardized mean differences (SMD), relative risks (RR) and 95 % CI (random effects models), subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were conducted. The meta-analysis suggested positive association of serum leptin with CRA (RR, 95 % CI 1.35, 1.03 to +1.76), but not CRC either at the pooled analysis on SMDs or RRs (SMD, 95 % CI 0.18, -0.04 to +0.40; RR, 95 % CI 1.04, 0.65 to +1.65). Significant heterogeneity between studies on CRC as well as between studies on CRA providing SMD was noted. Subgroup, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses highlighted potential methodology-, design-, size- and quality-related effect modifiers. Meta-analysis of current evidence suggests positive association of serum leptin with CRA but not with CRC risk. Given the case-control nature of available studies, the limited number of studies on serum leptin and CRA, and the heterogeneity of CRC studies, carefully designed, prospective studies preferably reporting RRs adjusted for a variety of confounders may be warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available