4.3 Article

Risk factors for young-onset colorectal cancer

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 335-341

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-0119-3

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Family history; Foods; Nutrients; Risk factors; Young

Funding

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC), Milan, Italy [10068]
  2. Swiss League and Research against Cancer/Oncosuisse [KFS-700, OCS-1633]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated risk factors for colorectal cancer in early-onset cancers, to provide quantitative estimates for major selected risk factors. We analyzed data from three Italian and Swiss case-control studies conducted between 1985 and 2009, including 329 colorectal cancer cases and 1,361 controls aged a parts per thousand currency sign45 years. We computed odds ratios (ORs) from unconditional logistic regression models, adjusted for major confounding factors. The OR of young-onset colorectal cancer was 4.50 for family history of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives, the association being higher in subjects with affected siblings (OR 11.68) than parents (OR 3.75). The ORs of young-onset colorectal cancer were 1.56 for a parts per thousand yen14 drinks/week of alcohol, 1.56 for the highest tertile of processed meat, 0.40 for vegetables, 0.75 for fruit, and 0.78 for fish intake. Among micronutrients, the ORs were 0.52 for beta-carotene, 0.68 for vitamin C, 0.38 for vitamin E, and 0.59 for folate. No significant associations emerged for physical activity, overweight, and diabetes. This study-the largest on young-onset colorectal cancer-confirms that several recognized risk factors for colorectal cancer are also relevant determinants of young-onset colorectal cancer. Family history of colorectal cancer in particular is a stronger risk factor in young subjects, as compared to middle age and elderly ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available