4.7 Article

p53 status dictates responses of B lymphomas to monotherapy with proteasome inhibitors

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages 4936-4943

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-050294

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA102709-01, R01 CA102709-02, R01 CA102709-03, R01 CA102709, CA 102709, CA 097932, R01 CA102709-04, R21 CA097932] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA102709, R21CA097932] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proapoptotic function of p53 is thought to underlie most anticancer modalities and is also activated in response to oncogenic insults, such as overexpression of the Myc oncoprotein. Here we generated tractable B lymphomas using retroviral transduction of the MYC oncogene into hematopoietic cells with 2 knock-in alleles encoding a fusion between p53 and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT) receptor (p53ER(TAM)). In these polyclonal tumors, Myc is the only oncogenic lesion, and p53ER(TAM) status can be rapidly toggled between off and on with 4OHT, provided that the Trp53 promoter has been independently activated. Although 4OHT can trigger widespread apoptosis and overt tumor regression even in the absence of DNA-damaging agents, in tumors with high levels of Mdm2 these responses are blunted. However, cotreatment with proteasome inhibitors fully restores therapeutic effects in vivo. Similarly, human Burkitt lymphomas with wildtype p53 and overexpression of Hdm2 are highly sensitive to proteasome inhibitors, unless p53 levels are reduced using the HPV-E6 ubiquitin ligase. Therefore, proteasome inhibitors could be highly effective as a monotherapy against Myc-induced lymphomas, with no need for adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. On the other hand, their efficacy is crucially dependent on the wild-type p53 status of the tumor, placing important restrictions on patient selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available