4.3 Article

Television viewing time of colorectal cancer survivors is associated prospectively with quality of life

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 1111-1120

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-011-9786-8

Keywords

Colorectal neoplasms; Survivorship; Health behavior; Quality of life; Longitudinal studies

Funding

  1. Cancer Council Queensland
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [586727, 569940]
  3. Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions Fellowship
  4. Queensland Health Core Research Infrastructure grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine prospective associations of television viewing time with quality of life, following a colorectal cancer diagnosis. One thousand, nine hundred and sixty-six colorectal cancer survivors were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry. Interviews were conducted at 5, 12, 24, and 36 months post-diagnosis. Generalized linear mixed models estimated the effects of television viewing time on quality of life. Participants who watched a parts per thousand yen5 h of television per day had a 16% lower total quality of life score than did participants reporting a parts per thousand currency sign2 h per day. Deleterious associations of television viewing time were found with all quality of life subscales: functional well-being showed the strongest association (23% difference in quality of life scores between highest and lowest television viewing categories), and social well-being the weakest association (6% difference). Participants who increased their television viewing by one category (e.g., a parts per thousand currency sign2 h, increasing to 3-4 h per day) had a proportional decrease of some 6% in their quality of life score (intra-individual effect). The deleterious associations of television viewing time with quality of life were clinically significant and consistent over time. Decreasing sedentary behavior may be an important behavioral strategy to enhance the quality of life of cancer survivors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available