4.3 Article

Has the lung cancer risk from smoking increased over the last fifty years?

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 389-397

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9708-1

Keywords

Cigarettes; Lung cancer; Changing risk; Changing cigarettes

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [263-MQ-320522, 263-MQ-414669]
  2. Tobacco Control Research and Education Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background We examine whether the lung cancer risk due to smoking has increased over time. Methods Lung cancer risk equations based on prospective mortality data collected from 1960 to 1972 were applied to 5-year birth-cohort-specific estimates of smoking behaviors among white males to estimate lung cancer mortality rates for U.S. white males from 1960 to 2000. These estimated rates were compared to U.S. white male mortality rates for the same birth cohorts. Results Observed birth-cohort-specific U.S. lung cancer mortality rates are substantially higher than those expected from changes in smoking behaviors, and the proportional difference increases with advancing calendar year. This trend persisted even when the duration term was increased in the risk equation. However, adjusting for changes in cigarette design over time by adding a term for the duration of smoking after 1972 resulted in the predicted rates closely approximating the observed U. S. mortality rates. Conclusion Lung cancer risk estimates observed during the 1960s under predict current lung cancer mortality rates in U.S. white males. Adjustment for the duration of smoking after 1972 results in estimates that reasonably approximate the observed U.S. lung cancer mortality, suggesting that lung cancer risks from smoking are increasing in the United States coincident with changes in cigarette design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available