4.3 Article

The interrelationships between and contributions of background, cognitive, and environmental factors to colorectal cancer screening adherence

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 1357-1368

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9563-0

Keywords

Colorectal neoplasms; Mass screening; Health surveys; Veterans

Funding

  1. United States' Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development service [IIR 04-042-2]
  2. Career Development Award [RCD03-174]
  3. Merit Review Entry Program [MRP 04-412-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives We examined the interrelationships between and contributions of background, cognitive, and environmental factors to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence. Methods In this study, 2,416 average risk patients aged 50-75 from 24 Veterans Affairs medical facilities responded to a mailed survey with phone follow-up (response rate 81%). Survey data (attitudes, behaviors, demographics) were linked to facility (organizational complexity) and medical records data (diagnoses, screening history). Patients with a fecal occult blood test within 15 months, sigmoidoscopy or barium enema within 5.5 years, or colonoscopy within 11 years of the survey were considered adherent. Logistic regressions estimated the association between adherence and background, cognitive, and environmental factors. Deviance ratios examined interrelationships between factors. Population attributable risks (PAR) were used to identify intervention targets. Results The association of background factors with adherence was partially explained by cognitive and environmental factors. The association of environmental factors with adherence was partially explained by cognitive factors. Cognitive and environmental factors contributed equally to adherence. Factors with the highest PARs for non-adherence were age 50-64, less than two comorbidities, and lack of physician recommendation. Conclusions Efforts to increase physician screening recommendations for younger, healthy patients at facilities with the lowest screening rates may improve CRC adherence in this setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available