4.3 Article

Incomplete pregnancy and risk of ovarian cancer: results from two Australian case-control studies and systematic review

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 1571-1585

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-009-9402-3

Keywords

Abortion; Spontaneous; Abortion; Induced; Ovarian neoplasms; Risk; Carcinoma

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
  2. Queensland Cancer Fund
  3. U. S Army Medical Research and Materiel Command
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  5. Cancer Council Tasmania and the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although full-term pregnancies reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, it has not been conclusively established whether incomplete pregnancies also influence risk. We investigated the relationship between a history of incomplete pregnancy and incident epithelial ovarian cancer among over 4,500 women who participated in two large Australian population-based case-control studies in 19901993 and 2002-2005. They provided responses to detailed questions about their reproductive histories and other personal factors. Summary odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) derived for each study using the same covariates were aggregated. We found no significant associations between the number of incomplete pregnancies and ovarian cancer, for parous (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.08) or nulliparous (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.75, 1.48) women, nor for the number of spontaneous or induced abortions and ovarian cancer for parous women (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.82, 1.09; OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.36) or nulliparous women (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.6, 2.4; OR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.38), respectively. A systematic review of 37 previous studies of the topic confirmed our findings that a history of incomplete pregnancy does not influence a woman's risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available