4.3 Article

Total visual blindness is protective against breast cancer

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 1753-1756

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-009-9405-0

Keywords

Blindness; Breast cancer; Visual impairment; Circadian; Light at night

Funding

  1. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Idea [BC030928, W81XWH-04-1-0553]
  2. Harvard Medical School Division of Sleep Medicine Training Program in Sleep, Circadian, and Respiratory Neurobiology [HL07901-11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Observational data, though sparse and based on small studies with limited ability to control for known breast cancer risk factors, support a lower risk of breast cancer in blind women compared to sighted women. Mechanisms influenced by ocular light perception, such as melatonin or circadian synchronization, are thought to account for this lower risk. Methods To evaluate whether blind women with no perception of light (NPL) have a lower prevalence of breast cancer compared to blind women with light perception (LP), we surveyed a cohort of 1,392 blind women living in North America (66 breast cancer cases). Results In multivariate-logistic regression models controlling for breast cancer risk factors, women with NPL had a significantly lower prevalence of breast cancer than women with LP (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.85). We observed little difference in these associations when restricting to postmenopausal women, non-shift workers or when excluding women diagnosed with breast cancer within 2 or 4 years of onset of blindness. Blind women with NPL appear to have a lower risk of breast cancer, compared to blind women with LP. More research is needed to elucidate the impact of LP on circadian coordination and melatonin production in the blind and how these factors may relate to breast cancer risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available