4.3 Article

Associations of circulating C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 with cancer risk: findings from two prospective cohorts and a meta-analysis

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 15-26

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-008-9212-z

Keywords

Cancer; Inflammation; C-reactive protein; Interleukin-6; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Department of Health. Grants from the British Heart Foundation
  2. (UK) Department of Health career scientist award
  3. (UK) Medical Research Council PhD Studentship
  4. ESRC [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G0600705] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0600705] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the associations of circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) with cancer risk. We examined the associations of CRP and IL-6 with incident cancer in two prospective cohorts, the British Women's Heart and Health Study (4,286 women aged 60-80) and the Caerphilly Cohort (2,398 men aged 45-59) using Cox regression and pooled our findings with previous prospective studies' in fixed and random effects meta-analyses. CRP and IL-6 were associated with some incident cancers in our cohorts, but the numbers of cancer cases were small. In our meta-analyses elevated CRP was associated with an increased overall risk of cancer (random effects estimate (RE): 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.18) and lung cancer (RE: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.61). Its associations with colorectal (RE: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.21) and breast cancer risks (RE: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.26) were weaker. CRP appeared unrelated to prostate cancer risk (RE: 1.00 0.88, 1.13). IL-6 was associated with increased lung and breast cancer risks and decreased prostate cancer risk, and was unrelated to colorectal cancer risk. Our findings suggest an etiological role for CRP and IL-6 in some cancers. Further large prospective and genetic studies would help to better understand this role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available