4.3 Article

Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to captan in the Agricultural Health Study

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 1401-1407

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-008-9187-9

Keywords

Captan; Cancer; Agricultural Health Study; Cohort; Prospective; Pesticide; Fungicide; CAS number 133-06-2

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  3. National Cancer Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Captan is a widely used antifungal pesticide whose potential to cause cancer in humans is uncertain. Methods We evaluated the incidence of cancer among pesticide applicators exposed to captan in the Agricultural Health Study. Detailed information on pesticide exposure and lifestyle factors was obtained from self-administered enrollment questionnaires completed between 1993 and 1997. Results Of the 48,986 applicators enrolled 4,383 (9%) had applied captan. Median follow-up time was 9.14 years. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate relative risks (RR) for cancer subtypes by tertiles of captan exposure. We investigated risk for all cancers combined and sites of cancer for which at least 15 cases occurred among captan-exposed applicators. These sites included cancers of the prostate, lung, and colon, blood-related cancers, and colorectal cancers. During follow-up 2,912 incident primary cases of cancer were identified. No association between the highest tertile of captan exposure (>67.375 intensity-weighted days) and development of all cancers (RR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.13) or cancer of any specific site was observed. Conclusion Although our study is limited by low numbers of observed cancer cases and follow-up time of 9.14 years, it does not provide evidence of an increased risk for the development of cancer at the investigated sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available