4.4 Article

Biodistribution and Dosimetry of Free 211At, 125I- and 131I- in Rats

Journal

CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 657-664

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2013.1483

Keywords

I-125(-); I-131(-); At-211; biodistribution; dosimetry

Funding

  1. European Commission [TARCC HEALTH-F2-2007-201962]
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Swedish Cancer Society
  4. BioCARE-a National Strategic Research Program at University of Gothenburg
  5. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority
  6. King Gustav V Jubilee Clinic Cancer Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

I-131 is widely used for therapy in the clinic and I-125 and I-131, and increasingly At-211, are often used in experimental studies. It is important to know the biodistribution and dosimetry for these radionuclides to determine potential risk organs when using radiopharmaceuticals containing these radionuclides. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biodistribution of I-125(-), I-131(-), and free At-211 in rats and to determine absorbed doses to various organs and tissues. Male Sprague Dawley rats were injected simultaneously with 0.1-0.3MBq I-125(-) and 0.1-0.3MBq I-131(-), or 0.05-0.2MBq At-211 and sacrificed 1 hour to 7 days after injection. The activities and activity concentrations in organs and tissues were determined and mean absorbed doses were calculated. The biodistribution of I-125(-) was similar to that of I-131(-) but the biodistribution of free At-211 was different compared to I-125(-) and I-131(-). The activity concentration of radioiodine was higher compared with At-211 in the thyroid and lower in all extrathyroidal tissues. The mean absorbed dose per unit injected activity was highest to the thyroid. I-131 gave the highest absorbed dose to the thyroid, and At-211 gave the highest absorbed dose to all other tissues studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available